##  [Well-Hyphenated Compound Adjectives](/favourite-articles/well-hyphenated-compound-adjectives)

##  Avertissement

Ce contenu est offert en anglais seulement.

Sheila Sanders
(*Terminology Update*, Volume 36, Number 1, 2003, page 32)

While surfing the Web the other day, I smiled when I read about the pet shop that offered to help clients choose *a well adjusted lizard*. Would that be an "adjusted lizard" who is healthy? The confusion in this phrase stems from one small omission; the reptile should be described as a *well-adjusted lizard*. Without the hyphen, the single idea of *well-adjusted*, meaning emotionally stable, is severed and the separate words produce a different meaning: *a well-adjusted lizard* is not the same as an *adjusted reptile who is healthy* or *well*. Though their impact is not always immediately obvious, hyphens contribute to the clarity of our language.

However, *well* is not always followed by a hyphen, as you will note in some of these instances:

1. Julie Payette, a Canadian astronaut who is well known, will be giving the keynote speech.
2. Julie Payette, a well-known Canadian astronaut, will be giving the keynote speech.
3. A. A. Bronson was looking for an art studio that was well ventilated.
4. A. A. Bronson was looking for a well-ventilated art studio.

In the first and third examples, where *well* comes after the noun it modifies (i.e. astronaut, studio), a hyphen is not needed because *well* functions as an adverb: *is well known*, *was well ventilated*.

But in the second and fourth sentences, where *well* comes before the noun being modified, *well* functions as part of a compound adjective (a *well-known* astronaut and a *well-ventilated* studio, not a *well* astronaut or a *well* studio), and so requires a hyphen.

Perhaps we have hit upon a rule: hyphenate compounds with *well* only when they appear before the nouns being modified, not after. But what’s a rule without an exception or two? Bear in mind that the position of *well* is merely an indication that a hyphen may be required; its placement in a sentence is not a guarantee. Here are some exceptions that prove the rule:

1. Mike Weir won the golf tournament with a well-timed shot.BUT
2. Mike Weir won the golf tournament with a shot that was well-timed.
3. Gwen’s well-intentioned actions led to unfortunate results.BUT
4. Gwen’s actions, though they were well-intentioned, led to unfortunate results.

In the second and fourth cases, *well* comes after the noun being modified yet it requires a hyphen because the sentences don’t make sense (or don’t have the same sense) if *well* is left out: *the shot was timed*; *the actions were intentioned*. The shot wasn’t timed (no one was holding a stopwatch) but it was *well-timed* (i.e. timely, opportune) and the actions weren’t intentioned (i.e. deliberate) but they were *well-intentioned* (i.e. based on good intentions).

If we look at hyphenated terms closely, we see they fall into one of two groups. The first contains compounds that are hyphenated only when used adjectivally. The second is made up of words that are consistently hyphenated because they are standard expressions that designate single concepts. For example, *well-appointed*, *well-founded* and *well-intentioned* do not have the same meaning as *appointed*, *founded*, and *intentioned*. Think of these expressions as "package deals," and always hyphenate them. Here is another compound that is hyphenated no matter where it occurs in a sentence:

Barb is a well-connected editor in Ottawa’s writing community.

As an editor who is well-connected, Barb is often approached with job offers.

The sentences lose their original meaning if *well* is left out.

If you are unsure which words are considered single concepts, dictionaries make good references, but even they vary in how they present information. For example, *The* *Canadian Oxford Dictionary* (1998) lists the compound adjectives *well-developed* and *well-acquainted*, but these do not appear in the list of hyphenated words in the *Gage Canadian Dictionary* (2000). The reverse is also true, with the hyphenated *well-contented* appearing in *Gage* but not shown in the *Oxford*. This may mean the two sources disagree as to which terms should always be hyphenated, or the difference may be in how the editors choose to list such information.

At this point, when you feel ready to throw up your hands and cry, "So which terms *should* I hyphenate?", remember that punctuation serves to clarify communication. Include a hyphen if it makes your meaning clearer; otherwise omit it.

There is one other exception. Don’t add a hyphen to *well* if it is modified:

As a well-regarded member of the firm, Atkinson was chosen to be the spokesperson.

BUT

As a very well regarded member of the firm, Atkinson was chosen to be the spokesperson.

But notice in the following example that *well* is modified and yet is still followed by a hyphen because it forms part of a standard expression:

The residents did not consider themselves to be very well-informed about security issues.

To summarize, *well* requires a hyphen when it functions as part of a compound adjective (generally when it precedes a noun). There is no hyphen when *well* functions as an adverb (usually following the noun being modified and a linking verb, such as *to be*), or when it is qualified (as in *extremely* well groomed). And lastly, a hyphen is always required whenever *well* is part of a standard expression.

Keep these tips on hyphenation in mind, even if you aren’t writing about well-adjusted lizards.

## Bibliography

*A Canadian Writer’s Reference*, Diana Hacker (1996)

*College English and Communication*, McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited (1978)

*Editing Canadian English*, Macfarlane Walter & Ross (1988 and 2000)

*Gage Canadian Dictionary* (2000)

*Handbook for Writers*, Jane Flick and Celia Millward (1993)

*ITP Nelson Canadian Dictionary* (1997)

*Mastering Effective English*, Tressler-Lewis (1961)

*Oxford Guide to Canadian English Usage* (1997)

*The Canadian Oxford Dictionary* (1998)

*The Canadian Press Stylebook* (1999)

*The Canadian Style*, Public Works and Government Services Canada (1997)

*The Careful Writer*, Theodore M. Bernstein (1977)

*The Chicago Manual of Style* (1993)

*The Globe and Mail Style Book* (1998)

*The Gregg Reference Manual*, Fifth Canadian Edition (1999)

*The Little, Brown Compact Handbook*, First Canadian Edition (1997)

*The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage* (1996)

"The Use of the Hyphen in Compound Modifiers," Peter Gawn, *Terminology Update*, 1974

##  Avis de droit d’auteur pour l’outil Favourite Articles

© Sa Majesté le Roi du chef du Canada, représenté par le ou la ministre des Services publics et de l’Approvisionnement
Un outil créé et mis en ligne par le Bureau de la traduction, Services publics et Approvisionnement Canada

## Rechercher par thèmes connexes

Vous voulez en apprendre davantage sur un thème abordé dans cette page? Cliquez sur un lien ci-dessous pour voir toutes les pages du Portail linguistique du Canada portant sur le thème choisi. Les résultats de recherche s’afficheront dans le [Navigateur linguistique](/fr/navigateur-navigator).

- [Punctuation](/fr/navigateur-navigator?search_api_fulltext=-&field_writing_tools=All&sort_by=views&f%5B1%5D=navigateur_navigator_english_theme%3A491#navigateur-navigator-resultats-results)
- [Punctuation marks](/fr/navigateur-navigator?search_api_fulltext=-&field_writing_tools=All&sort_by=views&f%5B0%5D=navigateur_navigator_english_theme%3A491&f%5B1%5D=navigateur_navigator_english_theme%3A494#navigateur-navigator-resultats-results)

## Liens connexes

- [Favourite Articles](/fr/favourite-articles/index-fra) (page d’accueil)
- [Outils d’aide à la rédaction](/fr/outils-tools/index-fra)
- [Navigateur linguistique](/fr/navigateur-navigator) (permet de trouver rapidement des conseils linguistiques)
- [TERMIUM Plus®](http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tpv2alpha/alpha-fra.html?lang=fra)
- [Communiquer avec le Portail linguistique du Canada](/fr/apropos-about-fra#a8)